Save the Date- Upcoming Events and Shows!

This is a quick post to let everyone know about some upcoming events. In particular, I’ll be the Featured Artist at the Benicia Plein Air Galler for the month of May. I’ll be doing a show all about redwoods. Scroll down for the details! :)

a sample piece from my upcoming may show “our redwoods”

a sample piece from my upcoming may show “our redwoods”


April 26, 27, 28th Plein Air Expo-

PACE19-all-type-logo_OL_retina.png

Since the Expo is in SF this year, I will be attending the event as a volunteer, helping out some of the demonstrators, painting plein air for fun, and checking it all out. I’ve never been before. I’m definitely NOT there as a presenter, but if folks want to connect, I thought it worth mentioning. It should be fun! :)


May 4-5th, May Benicia Open Studios 2019-

I’ll be participating in the Benicia Open Studios again, as a member of the Benicia Plein Air Gallery. The Open Studios occur the weekend of May 4th and 5th. We’ll have the tent out with additional work in it, and I’ll be out painting and doing an informal demo on Saturday from 1200-200.

Arts Benicia hosts the event, and will have a “teaser” show up at their gallery, featuring the work of participating galleries and artists. I’m representing the Benicia Plein Air Gallery this year, with a piece in that show. From there, you can take the shuttle to different locations, or start elsewhere, as you see fit.

Website for the event- https://artsbenicia.org/benicia-open-studios-2019/

This is the address for Arts Benicia- 991 Tyler St # 114, Benicia, CA 94510

And the address of the Benicia Plein Air Gallery- 307 1st St, Benicia, CA 94510

May 3-5th, The 11th Annual “Essential Figure” Show

 
IMG_5953.jpg
 

This group show is all about... you guessed it- figures! I’ll have 4 of my figurative paintings up for sale, as well as some extras in sleeves. If you’ve been following my on Facebook or Instagram (as stephenadamberry), you’ll have seen some samples of my work over the last year. I aim to be there on Sunday morning, until around 200 or so. If you’d like to connect, please contact me directly. This event is happening the same weekend as the Benicia Open Studios. Busy Stevie!

Website- http://www.bothwell.lvpac.org/events/2019/5/3/the-essential-figure-fine-art-figurative-show

Address- Bothwell Arts Center, 2466 8th Street, Livermore, CA, 94550


May 9- June 2nd- My Solo “Our Redwoods” Show

May 11th, 400-600- Reception!

 
Ferny grove.jpg
 

I will be May’s featured artist at the Benicia Plein Air Gallery. The weekend after the Open Studios my work will go up, and I’ll have my reception. This year, my show is all about redwood forests. I’ve been traveling to a variety of groves, and my paintings are all about them- Muir Woods, Armstrong Redwood Reserve, Big Basin, Hendy Woods, and the Navarro River Redwoods State Park. If you’ve been watching some of my posts, or follow me on Facebook or Instagram (as stephenadamberry), you’ll have seen some of the work I’ll be showing- ferny groves, CA bay trees, redwoods, fallen nursery trees, etc. Come and view them up close and maybe take one home! :)

Website: http://www.beniciapleinair.com/

Address: Benicia Plein Air Gallery- 307 1st St, Benicia, CA 94510

A Reading Guide to Dow's "Composition", pt. 5- Notan in the Field

9 Notan hand renditions.jpg

This is the last post in the series on Notan. I wanted to start with this video of Albala’s.  It’s a great introduction to applied notan, and the nuts and bolts of “arranging contrast-patterns” (whatever the contrast might be, whether color, value, texture, etc).

Around the 4:00 mark, Alabala begins to pick apart a notan of an image. I really love this section, where he shows two notans of the same painting, the first based on what are globally the lightest lights and the darkest darks (the one that doesn’t work), and the second based on localized value and color contrast (the successful notan). Part of what makes Notan so interesting as a mental tool is that it’s not objective, but rather is flexible and reflective of the viewer-- you can take the same subject and make different notans from it, depending on how you apply mid-values.

What Tools Does Notan Give Us?

The last two posts have focused a lot on master studies, but in this post I’ll focus a little on how to apply that knowledge to real world images-- the raw data, so to speak, before a master has simplified and arranged things for us. Having said that, the notan master studies help us practice two skills that are very useful—

1) Learning how the mid-values can be shifted to the dark or the light, and

2) Integrating patterns to create that ever-elusive “beauty of intermingling dark and light shapes”

Those two kernels will guide us as we move forward into our own studies. We can get pretty far if we keep them in mind. But notan can also help with another skill set, which we’ll also be exploring here as well-

3) Understanding and fixing logistical value-issues through creating a notan

I’ll show you what I mean in the studies below.

Shifting Middle Values In Different Notans-

 
Alternate Notan a color crop.jpg
 

This is an exercise that can really help you explore a subject. Below is a black and white version with 4 values assigned to it, and a notan based on it with values 3 and 4 being the darks. I’ve added in the person who was passing through after the photo was taken.

Alternate Notan b&w crop with numbers.jpg
Notan from b&w photo.jpg

Not bad, all in all. Are we done? It depends. If we shift the middle values around, moving our big shapes, we can explore things…

Below are four little notans. Each is about the size of a business card, so the shapes are very simplified. Sometimes, when I look at the subject I’ll squint or close one eye and let the other go blurry on purpose, just to see the bigger shapes better, and to stop focusing on detail so much. If I’m looking at a photo, I’ll actually shrink the image as much as possible (sometimes to something about as small as a stamp), which also helps me see the big shapes.

Alternate Notans from value studies.jpg
Alternate value studies with numbers.jpg

Each notan creates a different contrast pattern, which helps us focus on slightly different things. I’ve noted them with the red arrow. When I made little follow-up watercolor sketches, I separated out the values again, but you can see how I’ve tried to gently nudge the values one way or the other, to express the basic value-shapes that specific notan was expressing. Each version says something a little different, has a different mood, focuses our eye in a different way, but they’re all largely the same subject.

Different Orientations Affect the Intermingling of Shapes-

In these two follow ups, I explore different compositions as I alter the orientation of the image. Altering the orientation affects things in a variety of ways. Most importantly, the focal point often shifts, which requires some sort of change in the value patterns as well. This is one of the things that a notan can help us see really well.

In this pic of a suburban street after rain, the focal point shifts from somewhere in the sunlit midground, where the house is in the horizontal piece, to somewhere in the puddles and reflections themselves in the vertical piece. Each orientation requires us to push and open up contrast in a particular area. As we develop that area, deficiencies can become clear, and this is where the notan will help us decide how to nudge the middle values around.

Puddle Reflections square.jpg
Value Sketch and Notan 1.jpg

In the horizontal photo above, you can see that the house is blown out and needs more dynamic values to read properly. In the vertical piece below, the limited values of the house are unimportant and left pale, and instead the reflections and seam of the path defining the tree trunks become more important. The process of making each notan points out to us the strengths of each composition, and what we might need to change to improve upon it specifically.

Puddle Reflections vertical.jpg
Value Sketch and Notan 2.jpg

In the photo below, I explore two orientations again. In the horizontal, the goal is to let the long, sinuous shadows guide you to the tree, so I focus more on those, pushing and stretching the contrast between relatively similar faraway values, while letting the foreground remain uncomplicated.

Grassy slope horizontal.jpg
Value Sketch and Notan 3.jpg

In the vertical version, those long shadows are cropped from the picture plane, and the foreground and fence on the embankment become much more important. Here a problem is introduced. There’s simply not enough to really grab ahold of visually.  I decide to 1) introduce contrast for the fence to make it more dominant and 2) to magic some interest and contrast out of the foreground, which is pretty uniformly bright.  I get a result like this-

Grassy slope vertical.jpg
Value Sketch and Notan 4.jpg


Notan Is a Logistical Assessment Tool-

9 paintable subjects. I refer to them by number, with #1 at the top left, #3 at the top right, #7 at the bottom left, and #9 at the bottom right

9 paintable subjects. I refer to them by number, with #1 at the top left, #3 at the top right, #7 at the bottom left, and #9 at the bottom right

Here we have a collection of 9 color photos. Some are nicer than others, but they all seem paintable to me. However, photos are sneaky. They often have emotional content, or are a record of a memory, a trip, a place. And we imbue these images with that emotion. They sometimes have compelling color content as well. All of these elements are important, because they’re often why we want to paint something, but, in the voice of Yoda… “None of these things a good composition make!”

We’ll be going through some of them specifically, but I first wanted to give you a broader set to explore. What we’ll see as we go through the photos is that having a computer-generated notan is fine in some respects, but lacks the decision making required by the artist to make a notan achieve its full potential.

Below, we have the grid converted into a 4-value black and white set (on the left), and a 2-value Notan on the right. Most of the 4-value set still reads. The simplification just makes seeing the bigger shapes easier. But for some of the 2-value photos, the difference is stark and problematic. Some still read because of sneaky computer stippling that creates the feeling of a 3rd value (photo #1, 3, 7, 9). Some issues are very severe and obvious (#2 and 7 are the worst), and some are more subtle but just as problematic (#1, 3, 6, and 9, for example). It is at this point that we must begin to change things, and insert ourselves more thoroughly into the art-making process.

4-value grid

4-value grid

2-value Photoshop grid

2-value Photoshop grid

Below are the notans I made for each. Each handmade notan looks to solve certain issues clearly visible in the 2-value computer generated versions. Common issues to assess include- dark reflections in already dark water (that then get lost) (#1, 4, 6), a blown out sky that makes the ground plane seem too dark (#2, 5), and dark midground objects that can’t separate from a dark background (# 8, 9). Sometimes I change certain things, the shape of trees or forms, to better “intermingle” the darks and lights, and let the eye travel through the subject (#7, 8). Sometimes the notan just makes it clear that certain subjects will be difficult to paint well (#6).

notan grid

notan grid

Let’s take a look at a few of them up close.

Photo #2-

Obviously the 2-value computer generated notan doesn’t equate to the color photo. The handmade notan respects the gentle, localized shifts in value that makes the subject appealing and assigns importance to certain elements. This is very similar to notan #5.

photo2 2value.jpg
photo2 color.jpg

Photo #4-

Here the computer generated notan is adequate in many ways, but two things fall away- the reflections in the water, and the sense of the distant mountains. I’ve provided two notans. Both open up the reflections on water, but one lets the mountains recede, while the other makes the mountain range a very important part of the composition. Is one better than the other? I don’t know, but they’re most definitely not the same. You’ll find similar reflection issues being solved in Notan #1.

photo4 2value.jpg
photo4 color.jpg
photo4 notan.jpg
photo4 notan2.jpg


Photo #9-

Here the notan I’ve made fixes a number of problems in the photoshop version. Most notable is that a) the shed structure now has a roof, and b) that the foreground mudflats feel bright again, the way they do in the color photo. What is much more subtle, however, is that the dock was disappearing into the background, because they’re both dark values. This is actually a problem with the original photo too. What begins is a process of capturing some sort of directional light on the surface of the dock and pylons, as well as some judicious editing. These sorts of things are what makes making a notan a really stellar logistical tool. You’ll see similar sorts of dark against dark issues being solved in Notan #8, with the trees.

photo9 2value.jpg
photo9 color.jpg
photo9 notan.jpg

And that’s it for now.

I hope the posts provides folks with enough input to get them reading Dow’s book, learning from master studies, and with making their own notans. I was in NY last week, at the Met and the MOMA, and a huge part of how I was viewing work was as notans, whether with the delicately interlocking shapes of Vermeer, the dark and moody shapes of Rembrandt, the color-based shapes of Monet, or the scattered, woodblock-like shapes of Van Gogh. Even when I’m painting my own figure studies, I’m still thinking of Notan then too. It can be a very useful artistic tool, and affect how you see the world. It can be fun, honestly…

Happy intricate viewing! :)

A Reading Guide to Dow's "Composition", pt. 4- Deeper Into the Masters

vermeer notan combo.jpg

The Beauty of Intermingling Lights and Darks-

I wanted to come back to master-studies, and talk more about what we can get from making notans in this way. Yes, when we do this we duplicate dark and light patterns. But so what? What does that really teach us? The learning process goes deeper than that- otherwise, we could have a computer do it for us and we would just look at the results! The goal of making a master-study is to explore the work ourselves and to understand compositional decisions in reverse. To, as I often say in workshops, “read the tea leaves.” It requires decision-making on our part because we must ponder the decision-making of the artist, based on the breadcrumbs he or she has left for us in the image. This is how we can train ourselves to compose better. It’s part of how we develop “appreciation”.

How can we do this? What should folks be looking out for? What are the breadcrumbs? Why can’t a computer just do it for us? :P

First, as before, we must assess how to apply those tricksy mid-values to re-create the most compelling arrangement of black and white shapes. But second is what Dow calls “the beauty of intermingling dark and light shapes”, which I’ll be going in to more in this post. These two elements, combined, are powerful compositional tools. The notan seems almost uniquely built to help us explore them.

“The beauty of intermingling dark and light shapes”? Yep. We come back here to ye’ ol’ yin and yang again, which is not, after all, just two shapes swirling around each other. No, they are intertwined, each with a piece of the other within in. Balance. Opposition. Motion, and interest.

yin yang.jpg

We spend as much time staring at the two dots as we do at the swirls. Perhaps more. Therefore, each value not only defines the exterior of the other, but also "activates” the interior. A compelling notan should do the same.

I’ve provided a variety of master studies below, taken from a number of different sources. I’ve altered all of them in some way, to better represent my thinking and approach to notans. Some come from Mitch Albala’s blog, and some come from the Robinson video that I shared in the previous post, others thanks to Google search. Mitch’s blog, by the way, is superb. I can only imagine he must be an excellent teacher in person, as his thinking is already so clear on paper. Here is a introductory blog post he did on Notan, which is the original source for a number of photos I’m using today— https://blog.mitchalbala.com/the-wisdom-of-notan/ It’s worth a read too.

The point of making notan master-studies is to pay attention to compositional decisions that were made by the original painter- to train ourselves to better think and see, by looking through the eyes of another. Our notans should reflect this thinking. Hopefully, this approach will become clearer as we explore the examples below.

Example Studies-

Degas 1-

Degas notan combo.jpg

Here we have a Degas. Of course, the dances are pale, and the floor and background are dark. These are the big shapes that inter-relate, with the swirl of dancers on the right leading you to the head of the central figure. But also notice the important “intermingled” details that I’ve marked out with red arrows- the crook of both arms, the shadow of the hand, and the odd window and stage lights to the left. Particularly the window. The balance it provides to the head is important, and it would have been so easy to leave it out of the painting.

Note too how the head is almost completely surrounded by darks. Sometimes we find “secondary” objects on site (through providence) that do what we want, but really… we often have to introduce them, to create the contrasts we want, where we want them. I can’t imagine all those darks were just perfectly found there by accident, framing the dancer’s head. Degas placed them there to do a job, to highlight the face! Try removing some of them, and you’ll see how important they are.

Degas 2-

Notans can show us a lot about how an artist specifically placed things for certain effects. In this Degas below, look at the two sets of hands. Who knows where they were placed at first? They tell a story, yes, but they also break up the two deep, black areas. Speaking of which, the dark shape the two combined figures make is itself very interesting and sinuous- there is no separation between them! Instead, the two figures bond together, even with the shadows around them, to create a “river” for you to move through the painting on. The chair, of course, is like an arrow, breaking up the darkness and leading us back up to the faces and hands. The movement from dark to light to dark guides us through the image and creates points of interest. Try removing some of these intermingled lights, and you’ll see how valuable they are, providing points of interest in our viewing experience. Yin and Yang.

degas notan 2nd combo.jpg

The window panes behind the man help make a compelling notan too. They are busy and active, with many strong lines that make us pay attention to the reader’s head. A very important location!! Don’t forget that funny little bit of dark fireplace on the left either, clearly there to break up the pale expanse of the mantel. I can easily imagine that the white mantle was wider in real life, and Degas had to bring the dark shape into the picture plane for balance. Even the books and papers on the table (all placed or serendipitously found there) are relevant to the composition, as their jumble of shapes in the bottom of the picture plane creates a kind of “mirror image” notan to the heads up top, very much like a reflection in a river scene.

Turner’s Storm-

turner notan combo.jpg

Turner’s storm is swirling and guiding us in to the boat, but actually, it’s rather hard to make a notan out of it. Why? Because it’s almost entirely mid values, and all the edges are soft. The shapes aren’t obvious. But if you close one eye and let the other one go blurry, you can see them, as the middle values begin to separate from each other. Don’t forget- it’s the localized contrast that matters, not the lightest lights and darkest darks globally. Nothing else is as white as the sail, and almost nothing is as dark as the hull, but there is still a swirling notan in the rest of the composition, made up almost entirely of middle values and soft edges.

Whistler-

Here we have a Notan from Whistler. This is from Albala’s website. I’ve modified it slightly to reflect certain details I find important. Different notans of a subject ought to vary in some way, depending on the viewer and how you see the subject, and what contrasts you want to focus on. We’ll be talking about making multiple notan’s from a single subject in the next (and final) post in this series.

notan-whistler combo.jpg

Again, we have some very strong, big shapes with the white dress against the very dark back ground. However, certain small, localized shifts in value, such as the reflected face or the flowers in front of the fireplace (both of which I added to the notan), are also very important. They help the eye transition from dark to light, and back again, as the two basic shapes “break apart” and intermingle. Almost all of these small intermingled shapes are of a middle value… almost none of them are as white as the dress, but they’re all critical.

Note too the recessive rectangular shape to the left of the woman’s hair. This helps define the back of her head. This is very much like that block of darkness behind the head of the ballerina way back in the first Degas I shared. I added this bit of white into Albala’s notan too. Why? Because it’s an example of how we can benefit from making notans ourselves.

I can just imagine Whistler working on this image, frustrated because the woman’s hair was not separating enough from the background, with her head just dissolving into the corner. The answer? Introduce an alternate-valued shape to the left, even a middle-valued recessive one. The shift is subtle but important in the original piece. In the notan, if you remove it, the need becomes very clear. As students learning from these studies, we have to look at the final piece, and try and think in reverse.

Vermeer’s Milkmaid-

vermeer notan combo.jpg

Here again we have a notan that I’ve gently amended, but the truth is that this piece has a lovely strong composition, and a basic notan speaks to much of this- the big, bold swirling shapes of light versus dark (rather yin and yang, when seen as a notan), and the lovely jumble of shapes at the center of interest. Not how various elements point you there, from the arms of the milkmaid, to the fold in her gown, to the draping bits of table cloth, all of which become clear in the notan because of tonal contrasts. Just like with Degas’ readers, here we have a window with panes, active and busy, that draws the eye, but also note how it balances the composition and opens up the darker area, much like how the fireplace did in that same earlier Degas.

Finally, there are two odd bits of stuff that are worth pointing out- that quirky little box on the floor and the shiny kettle in the background. Why are they there? Is it part of a domestic narrative that most of us aren’t clued in to anymore? Perhaps... Most likely, even. But both also add to the composition, activating the floor and wall through contrast, so that that broad open, empty expanse of sunlit wall can remain open. So that it can feel open by comparison.

And that’s it for today. I hope these examples are of some use. That they direct you in your own notan-studies, and help make clear the little markers, contrasts, composition-choices you can be looking out for.

In the next post, I’ll be wrapping up the reading guide to Dow’s “Composition”, as we explore using notan “in real life.” I’ll be going through some examples of my own notans, breaking them down and comparing them to both color and black and white photos of different locations.

A Reading Guide to Dow's "Composition", pt. 3- Notan

 
notice how notan applies to many different artistic disciplines- textiles, sculpture, wood working, and, yes, painting too.

notice how notan applies to many different artistic disciplines- textiles, sculpture, wood working, and, yes, painting too.

 

In this post, I’ll be discussing why you should give a damn about Notan, how it grows out of line-composition, exercises from the book you might like to try, and how we can learn from the Masters by “notanizing” their compositions. In the next post, I’ll be sharing some examples of Notan-making “in the wild”, how you can arrive at different notans for the same subject, and how using notan well really requires that you engage and make decisions that reflect your personal perspective. Notan-making is not a robotic affair, whatever certain apps seem to suggest.

What is Notan?

Notan literally means “dark-light” in Japanese. I’m sure it has many other nuances I don’t understand, but we’re going to roll with that very basic definition for now. The intent is that all shapes are reduced to black and white, but even more important is the underlying presumption that there’s a balance of shapes. So although you may use Line to divide space, Notan is about mass. And it’s not a value sketch either, as there’s no grey. Again, all shapes must be reduced to their most basic value-relationships— Is it light or is it dark? Is it white or is it black?

Here’s a little video where a fellow goes in to it. I found it succinct and to the point. Please forget (or don’t, if that’s your preference) the advertising element of the video—

Of all the concepts that Dow posits in his book, Notan is the one that, in my opinion, is the best developed and most useful. When done right, it can be very revealing— you’ll often see why an image works, or (alternately) what is failing it, because contrast-relationships and composition become very clear. In many ways, it’s the fruition of a great deal of thinking from earlier portions of the book—whatever one has learned about the Principles of Composition, or Appreciation, or how Line-division can create compelling proportions, or the importance of the shape of the picture plane are all still relevant. In fact, they’re essential if you want to get the most out of Notan.

Notan and the Beauty of a Two-Dimensional Space—

 
IMG_5494.JPG
 

Exploring Notan echoes and amplifies the concept that “painting is the art of two dimensions.” Dow calls Notan “tone-composition”, as well as “darks and lights in harmonic relations” and “the beauty of opposing and intermingling masses of black and white.” It’s about seeing painting as a space-art, not just a clever representation (or re-presentation) of three dimensional space based on jedi mind tricks. It uses shadow and light as a starting point, but honestly has very little to do with shadows or perspective or story.

The concept is that, totally separate from (the also important) representational elements of an image, “lines, tones, and colors may be simply beautiful in themselves” because “synthetically related masses of dark and light convey an impression of beauty entirely independent of meaning”. “Synthetically related” is the operative phrase here, meaning dynamically balanced by the human mind, meaning not necessarily a copy of nature (although perhaps inspired by it!). Black and white ink blots and geometric patterns (which are basically notans) can of course be beautiful in and of themselves, and the notan of a painting is no different. None of these examples rely on representation or story to be compelling. Rather, their beauty depends almost entirely on the “synthetic” arrangement of shapes.

Mass and emptiness. Proportion. Pattern. Balance and disorder.

Notan.

How can we find something beautiful “entirely independent of meaning”? Phew! That’s a big question! I don’t know, but I’ll give it a go— Because the experience of patterns found and burnished makes us feel like we can communicate with and echo the natural world? In a beautiful painting there is a feeling that an artist is arranging patterns to generate a kind of active tension, a precarious balance of shapes, the arrangement of which synthetically creates a sense of “found” organic disorder. Honestly, it’s a kind of magic, because, of course, it is not totally random and disordered, but instead is made. When we see beauty in nature, it often feels like a wonderful accident—what is truly actually “found” feels as if it were properly, dynamically balanced. In many ways, we judge each experience by the other. As I’ve said before, "If beauty in nature is discovering patterns conjured by chance, then beauty in art is discovering chance conjured from patterns."

And how do we assess when an arrangement of shapes is beautiful? Appreciation. Ha! How do we develop our Appreciation? Yep, by developing our ability to judge, by “choosing and criticizing” one’s own work, and by reverse engineering the work of masters. The learning process is the same as with Line, only now we are taking the divisions of space, the proportions created with Line and we are adding mass to the equation.

Line Leads to Notan—

At one point, Dow says “a line scheme underlies every notan composition, and a notan scheme underlies every color composition.” This is really true! Just as multiple line-compositions can be developed from one subject (depending on how we select and frame the subject inside the picture plane), so too can we build multiple Notans from a single line-composition. Lines creates proportion, but the arrangements of mass within those divisions can vary dramatically. That’s really what Notan is— Line Proportion + Mass.

So the work studying and exploring Line and Proportion is of real use as we study Value and Mass. If you can’t divide space elegantly with Line, you’ll have a hard time doing it with Mass. Proportion is proportion. Spacing is spacing. Appreciation is still Appreciation.

Dow explores the idea of the “notanization” of line-compositions in the book, and provides some interesting examples (which I’ll touch on below). He very much likes the idea of starting with abstracts, where we can practice building interesting notans without being bound by representational concerns. It’s all just pure space composition and abstract divisions of space.

Exercises-

Exercise #1- pg. 61 Multiple Notans from a Single Line-Composition

 
IMG_5492.JPG
 

In this example, the idea is to explore the various ways you can fill the spaces created with line. What gives dominance to the dark or light? How does focusing contrast in one version change the composition, versus another? Even within the examples he himself gives, one can see how different versions don’t just “fill it in” in different ways, but truly change where you focus and what becomes important. The notan is critical.

Exercise #2- pg. 67 Abstract Notans

IMG_5490.JPG
IMG_5496.JPG

Part of what’s so interesting about Dow’s approach to Notan is how he applies the concept to a host of different artistic fields. Anything that involves 2-tone patterns are of interest to him- textiles, sculpture, pottery, etc.

Exercise #3- pg 62- Notan from Flowers

 
IMG_5495.JPG
 

This is very similar to earlier exercises in the book, where we were altering the picture plane of line-compositions, or “proportion-compositions”… because that’s all line drawings are, at base—divisions of space within the two-dimensional picture plane, which our minds then turn into representations of objects. We must choose the picture plane shape that we want, and divide it up with Good Spacing. The difference now? We’re choosing and altering the picture plane, just like before, except within its boundaries we’re making tone-compositions (which are based on line-compositions). Note how many notans you can make out of a single flower line-composition. Quite a few!

Exercise #4- pg 70, Multiple Notans from a Single Landscape Line-Composition

 
IMG_5497.JPG
 

Just like exercise #1, except now we begin to deal with more and more representational shapes. For some folks, this is easier, because abstraction isn’t their forte, but remember—the goal is not just accurate representation. That is the trap, and why this exercise comes last!! The hardest thing of all, in my opinion, is to take an existing, real object or photo and think about it only as two-dimensional tone-shapes, and yet also to still have it look like a boat or a house or a hill or whatever, right? Yikes!!

In the end, we may want the painting to tell a story, and for that we may need representation… but we shouldn’t let “accurate representation” alone dictate our painting process. The true underlying goal of using Notan is to open our mind, so our eyes can actually see the shapes we are using.

Copying from Masters

 
IMG_5499.JPG
 

Dow calls beauty “visual music”, an experience that occurs when the integration of shapes leads to “every part of a work of art (having) something to say.” The goal is to interpret subjects instead of imitating them. The beauty comes from injecting ourselves into the process, so that we are obliged “to select and reject, to keep only the essentials” so that “all the lines and areas (are) related one to another by connections and placings, so as to form a beautiful whole.” A tall order! The good news is that many wonderful artists have come before us, and studying their work critically can help us teach ourselves.

Superb works are good to learn from not because they are technically masterful (although they most likely are), but because they physically represent the result of all the thinking that has been done beforehand. Through the pathway of the painting we can gain access to another artist’s hard-won experience. This is where using Notan can help us learn, because it can allow us (atleast in part) to reverse engineer the work of painters we love. If I really wanted to assess what Sargent or Turner or Hopper or Rembrandt (or any contemporary artists I might love) understood about composition, I wouldn’t necessarily copy their paintings (although, yes, of course, that’s a good way to learn, too). What I’d really do is create notans of their works, to better understand the bones of the compositions.

 
IMG_5498.JPG
 

Lets take a quick look at a couple of examples that Dow provides, and see what we can learn about the process.

This first one is Corot’s “The Boat Leaving From the Shore.” Note how the mid-values in the foreground get put into the “whites” just like the very pale sky, even though the foreground is about the same value as the top of the trees.

the color original

the color original

a black and white version

a black and white version

dow’s simplified 2-value notan version

dow’s simplified 2-value notan version

Mid-values can be hard to assess when you make a notan, because you personally have to decide if you want to assign them to black or white. What’s most important to recognize is that Notans, as I understand and apply them, are here to help us identify and develop compelling contrast-patterns, not just so we paint with “lights and darks”. We’ll unpack this more in the next post, but the important part is to understand that the foreground in this image is a highlight in its own localized area of the painting, and so we make it white in the notan. Whether it’s a value is a 5 or an 7 on a scale of 10 doesn’t matter as much as what it’s placed next to. Notan is not about absolute value, but rather comparative value and contrast.

This next one is Millet’s “Sheep Shearers”. Once again, note how the dark background area behind the shadowed figure is made to be white, even though it is easily darker than many parts of the barrel in the original, which is made to be black in the notan. Note too how the distant horizon is made to be more interesting through the creation of contrast. Those little mid-value shapes (aka far away trees) also become black in the notan. The goal is to pay attention to localized contrast.

millett sheep shearers.jpg
millett sheep shearers b&w.jpg
millett sheep shearers notan.jpg

In the next post, we’ll step farther into "copying the masters”, as well as look into making notans from scratch. It definitely can do is show us problems with a potential composition— something we’re not getting with these copies. There are definitely things to pay attention to, to make it the most useful tool it can be.